beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

However, he is about to arm them with many valid reasons why it is crucial for them to join the opposition. As example, King uses I have a dream that one day and Let freedom ring.. to open his points on how Americans should change against racial indifferences. To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr. in his speech, "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, discusses the Vietnam war. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. writing your own paper, but remember to By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. He also makes an emotional plea by vividly describing the conditions in Vietnam. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. Would you like to get a custom case study? Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". Dr. King's purpose is . King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. 804-506-0782 to help you write a unique paper. Moreover, it is the poor and the helpless mainly who are falling prey to this war game. In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence", delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. Due to the Vietnam War is that plenty of individuals, both Americans and Vietnamese were killed. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. King demonstates this by saying, In deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. It also reminds people of inequality through images of everyday life in the United States. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! While pathos elicits an emotional response from the audience to make them more accepting of Kings ideas, repetition structures the speech and emphasizes key ideas for the audience to take away from listening. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. Martin Luther King Jr. Src: Pixabay Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. 1) Controversial Opinions of MLK 2) Religious figure talking about political problems 3) Malcolm X and his ideas Fitting Response EXIGENCY First Persona-Martin Luther King Second Persona-American Population and the Civil Rights Movement Third Persona- Vietnamese Population You may use it as a guide or sample for Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. Furthermore, such a vivid picture will linger permanently in the audiences mind, which will make them think about the terrible outcome in the future. Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. In short, this makes the audience more inclined to listen to the rest of Martin Luther king Jr's speech, as well as setting the bottom line that the Vietnam War creates devastating problems for everyone. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. The war was only going to consume lives and resources. On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. - M.J. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. Copyright 2023 service.graduateway.com. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. assume youre on board with our, Martin Luther King Jr. vs. President Obama, https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. Apart from the use of ethos, pathos and logos in his speech, he builds a rock solid argument by involving religious figures and facts from history and philosophy. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. Logos appeals to reasoning and argumentation by applying statistics, factual evidence, and data. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. King Jr knew that war creates confusion and that his audiences mind was boggled with questions. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. Though disappointed, King still loves the church. He expresses that the first step toward equality as the earth moving and nations running with fear. The line, For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent, demonstrates how King uses parallelism. * Hyperlink the URL after pasting it to your document, American Women Struggle in the 20th Century, Charlottesville Tragedy: Racial Issue in the USA, Prison Staffing and Correctional Officers Duties, Gender Issues in the Us Correctional System. (21). Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. Through his compelling arguments and moral vision, King inspired many people to join the movement against the Vietnam War and to work for a more just and peaceful world. Public Speech. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." report, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther Kings Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States.