ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). legacy - ok @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. Feedback is welcome If your tested hardware or image file is not listed here, please tell me and I will be glad to add it to the table here. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. 8 Mb. 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===> Also, what GRUB theme are you using? The live folder is similar to Debian live. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I think it's ok as long as they don't break the secure boot policy. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all That's an improvement, I guess? Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. @ventoy No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. When the user select option 1. Thank you! , Laptop based platform: I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. what is the working solution? UEFI Secure Boot (SB) is a verification mechanism for ensuring that code launched by a computer's UEFI firmware is trusted. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. memz.mp4. Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. And we've already been over whether USB should be treated differently than internal SATA or NVMe (which, in your opinion it should, and which in mine, and I will assert the majority of people who enable Secure Boot, it shouldn't). I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. git clone git clone I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. It looks like that version https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33 fixes issue with my thinkpad. da1: quirks=0x2. @steve6375 Delete the Ventoy secure boot key to fix this issue. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. It typically has the same name, but you can rename it to something else should you choose to do so. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. I've already disabled secure boot. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. Using Ventoy-1.0.08, ubuntudde-20.04-amd64-desktop.iso is still unable to boot under uefi. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. It only causes problems. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Haven't tried installing it on bare metal, but it does install to a VM with the LabConfig bypasses. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. And that is the right thing to do. My guesd is it does not. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? I didn't try install using it though. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: In the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Strelec WinPE) Ctrl+r for ventoy debug mode Ctrl+h or h for help m checksum a file 1. Does shim still needed in this case? How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); If you have a tech problem, we probably covered it! 2. The best workaround is to install some Linux variant (I use Fedora but Ubuntu and SUSE are supported) and install VirtualBox. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. () no boot file found for uefi. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. 1. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. The easiest thing to do if you don't have a UEFI-bootable Memtest86 ISO is to extract the \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.efi file and just copy that to your Ventoy drive. Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. You signed in with another tab or window. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Unable to boot properly. That is just to make sure it has really written the whole Ventoy install onto the usb stick. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! Results when tested on different models\types of x86 computers - amount of RAM, make/model, latest BIOS? check manjaro-gnome, not working. snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. . Do I still need to display a warning message? ", same error during creating windows 7 Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. Yes. I checked and they don't work. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Error description and that is really the culmination of a process that I started almost one year ago. You can't just convert things to an ISO and expect them to be bootable! Well occasionally send you account related emails. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) Download Debian net installer. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. @pbatard Already have an account? Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Thanks. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded.